ANDERSON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 2:06-CV-741 TS. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Utah
Number: infdco20140910c77
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF, OR REFERENCE TO, INSURANCE AT TRIAL TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Sepco's ("Sepco") Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of, or Reference to, Insurance During Trial. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendant's Motion in part. The Court will apply the Federal Rules of Evidence at trial. The Court will grant the Defendant's Motion
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF, OR REFERENCE TO, INSURANCE AT TRIAL TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Sepco's ("Sepco") Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of, or Reference to, Insurance During Trial. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendant's Motion in part. The Court will apply the Federal Rules of Evidence at trial. The Court will grant the Defendant's Motion ..
More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF, OR REFERENCE TO, INSURANCE AT TRIAL
TED STEWART, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Sepco's ("Sepco") Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of, or Reference to, Insurance During Trial. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendant's Motion in part.
The Court will apply the Federal Rules of Evidence at trial. The Court will grant the Defendant's Motion in Limine to the extent that it complies with Federal Rule of Evidence 411. Federal Rule of Evidence 411 states, "Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible to prove whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. But the court may admit this evidence for another purpose, such as proving a witness's bias or prejudice or proving agency, ownership, or control."
It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Sepco's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of, or Reference to, Insurance During Trial (Docket No. 406) is GRANTED IN PART.
Source: Leagle
