Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

COOKE v. MORRIS, 2:14cv879DAK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Utah Number: infdco20150716d25 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING & AFFIRMING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION DALE A. KIMBALL , District Judge . This case was assigned to United States District Judge Dale A. Kimball, who referred it to United States Magistrate Judge Dustin Pead under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). On June 17, 2015, Magistrate Judge Pead issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed pursuant to Rules 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Report and Recommendatio
More

ORDER ADOPTING & AFFIRMING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

This case was assigned to United States District Judge Dale A. Kimball, who referred it to United States Magistrate Judge Dustin Pead under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On June 17, 2015, Magistrate Judge Pead issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed pursuant to Rules 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Report and Recommendation notified Plaintiff that any objection to the Report and Recommendation was required to be filed within fourteen days of receiving it. Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing an objection has passed.

The court has reviewed the case de novo and the court agrees with the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The court hereby adopts it as the order of the court. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to Rules 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer