Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Balding v. Sunbelt Steel Texas, Inc., 2:14-CV-00090. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Utah Number: infdco20160425a80 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CLARK WADDOUPS , District Judge . This matter is before the court on Sunbelt Steel Texas, Inc. and Sunbelt Steel Texas, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 53), Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 52); and Defendants' Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Non-Retained Expert Testimony (Dkt. No. 65). A hearing on all motions was held before the Honorable Clark Waddoups on April 21, 2016. Randy Andrus
More

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Sunbelt Steel Texas, Inc. and Sunbelt Steel Texas, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 53), Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 52); and Defendants' Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Non-Retained Expert Testimony (Dkt. No. 65). A hearing on all motions was held before the Honorable Clark Waddoups on April 21, 2016. Randy Andrus appeared on behalf of Plaintiff and James Barrett appeared on behalf of Defendants. After due consideration of the parties' filings and oral arguments, and otherwise being fully advised,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated on the record, that Sunbelt Steel Texas, Inc. and Sunbelt Steel Texas, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 53) is GRANTED, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 52) is GRANTED; and Defendants' Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Non-Retained Expert Testimony (Dkt. No. 65) is DENIED AS MOOT.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants on all counts.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer