Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

THONGVATHSA v. ROBERTS FURNITURE AND MATTRESS AND PENNSYLVANIA MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 2240-10-1. (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia Number: invaco20110322b48 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 22, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2011
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM Vilayvong Kapoo Thongvathsa appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding his injury by accident was not compensable because he was not engaged in a "special errand" for his employer at the time he was injured. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Thongvathsa v. Roberts Furniture & Mattre
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION*

PER CURIAM

Vilayvong Kapoo Thongvathsa appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding his injury by accident was not compensable because he was not engaged in a "special errand" for his employer at the time he was injured. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Thongvathsa v. Roberts Furniture & Mattress, VWC File No. VA020-0000-0131 (Sept. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

FootNotes


* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer