UNPUBLISHED

MEMORANDUM OPINION*

PER CURIAM.

The Uninsured Employer's Fund (Fund) appeals from a December 2, 2013 order of the Workers' Compensation Commission affirming a deputy commissioner's opinion finding that Laquita Edna Opperman (claimant) remains disabled from her October 31, 2008 work accident. On appeal, Fund contends the commission erred by (1) "finding that Claimant remains disabled as a result of the October 31, 2008 industrial accident," (2) "giving weight to the opinions of Claimant's treating physician, Dr. Eric Goldberg, because Dr. Goldberg's opinions lacked credibility and his opinion that Claimant remains disabled is impeached by his own written opinions and was not based on a physical examination," (3) "failing to find that any aggravation of Claimant's September 21, 1993 accident at the Norfolk Naval shipyard caused by the October 31, 2008 accident has resolved and Claimant has returned to pre-injury baseline," (4) "failing to find that any disability Claimant may have is unrelated to the October 31, 2008 accident and is, instead, caused by the September 21, 1993 Shipyard accident for which Claimant is still receiving medical benefits and wages," and (5) "discounting the corroborated medical opinions of Mark Ross, M.D. that the Claimant is no longer disabled and failed to consider Claimant's Functional Capacity Evaluation results."

Upon reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. We affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Opperman v. Vicky Little t/a Little Cleaner, VWC File No. VA01002421442 (Dec. 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.