ROCKINGHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. NORRIS, 0615-14-3. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Number: invaco20140812f42
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM. Rockingham Memorial Hospital and Safety National Casualty Corporation (collectively "employer") appeal a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission (hereinafter "the commission"). On appeal, employer argues that the commission erred in finding Maureen Norris sustained an injury by accident on February 8, 2011, arising out of and during the course of her employment, that she injured her left knee, neck, and back as a result of the accident, t
Summary: UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM. Rockingham Memorial Hospital and Safety National Casualty Corporation (collectively "employer") appeal a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission (hereinafter "the commission"). On appeal, employer argues that the commission erred in finding Maureen Norris sustained an injury by accident on February 8, 2011, arising out of and during the course of her employment, that she injured her left knee, neck, and back as a result of the accident, th..
More
UNPUBLISHED
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
PER CURIAM.
Rockingham Memorial Hospital and Safety National Casualty Corporation (collectively "employer") appeal a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission (hereinafter "the commission"). On appeal, employer argues that the commission erred in finding Maureen Norris sustained an injury by accident on February 8, 2011, arising out of and during the course of her employment, that she injured her left knee, neck, and back as a result of the accident, that her disability was causally related to her injuries, that she adequately marketed her residual work capacity, and that her care with Dr. Terry L. Overby was authorized treatment. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Norris v. Rockingham Mem'l Hosp., VWC File No. JCN VA00000419618 (Mar. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
FootNotes
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Source: Leagle
