Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. RANKING, 3:09cr130-HEH. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Virginia Number: infdco20130812945 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2013
Summary: ORDER (Accepting Report and Recommendation and Denying 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion) HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge. In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Ranking's objection to the Report and Recommendation is OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 72) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED; 3. The motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No. 29) is DENIED; 4. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and, 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
More

ORDER (Accepting Report and Recommendation and Denying 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion)

HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge.

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Ranking's objection to the Report and Recommendation is OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 72) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED; 3. The motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 29) is DENIED; 4. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and, 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Ranking may appeal the decision of the Court. Should he wish to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a timely notice of appeal may result in the loss of the ability to appeal.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Ranking and counsel for the United States.

It is SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer