KETTLER INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 2:14cvl89. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Virginia
Number: infdco20150108d97
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2015
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER HENRY COKE MORGAN, Jr., Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant Kettler International, Inc.'s ("Kettler") Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority. Doc. 54. Kettler has moved for leave to file discovery responses submitted by Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff Starbucks Corporation ("Starbucks"), which shows that three of four chairs identified in Starbucks' Opposition to Kettler's Motion for Sanctions as having broken
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER HENRY COKE MORGAN, Jr., Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant Kettler International, Inc.'s ("Kettler") Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority. Doc. 54. Kettler has moved for leave to file discovery responses submitted by Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff Starbucks Corporation ("Starbucks"), which shows that three of four chairs identified in Starbucks' Opposition to Kettler's Motion for Sanctions as having broken a..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY COKE MORGAN, Jr., Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant Kettler International, Inc.'s ("Kettler") Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority. Doc. 54. Kettler has moved for leave to file discovery responses submitted by Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff Starbucks Corporation ("Starbucks"), which shows that three of four chairs identified in Starbucks' Opposition to Kettler's Motion for Sanctions as having broken at Starbucks locations have been destroyed. Kettler argues that such conduct is further evidence in support of its Motion for Sanctions.
Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7(F)(1), leave of court is required to file additional briefs or written communications after Plaintiffs reply brief is filed. These discovery responses are relevant to the pending Motion for Sanctions, and were filed after Kettler's deadline to file a reply brief.
Accordingly, the Motion for Leave to File is GRANTED. If Starbucks is so advised, it may file a written submission in response. Any such submission may not exceed three (3) pages, and shall be filed within five (5) days from the entry oft his Order.
The Clerk is REQUESTED to send a copy oft his Order to all counsel of record.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
