Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Altitude 24/7 Plumbing Heating and Cooling Ltd., 1:18cv0159 (TSE/JFA). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Virginia Number: infdco20180531f14 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 04, 2018
Latest Update: May 04, 2018
Summary: PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHN F. ANDERSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). (Docket no. 12). Plaintiffs arc the Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipelitters National Pension Fund ("National Pension Fund") and the Trustees of the International Training Fund ("International Training Fund"). Each plaintiff seeks a default judgment against the defendant Altitude
More

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). (Docket no. 12). Plaintiffs arc the Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipelitters National Pension Fund ("National Pension Fund") and the Trustees of the International Training Fund ("International Training Fund"). Each plaintiff seeks a default judgment against the defendant Altitude 24/7 Plumbing Heating and Cooling LTD ("Altitude"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). the undersigned magistrate judge is tiling with the court his proposed findings of fact and recommendations, a copy of which will be provided to all parties.

Procedural Background

On February 13,2018. the plaintiffs tiled this action alleging that Altitude breached a Collective Bargaining Agreement with the United Association Local I Anion No. 145 and seeking an award for past due contributions, liquidated damages, interest attorney's fees and costs, and for injunctive relief. (Docket no. 1). A summons for the complaint was issued on February 14, 2018 (Docket no. 3), and the summons and complaint were served on Altitude on February 23, 2018 (Docket no. 4). In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), a responsive pleading was due on March 16, 2018, 21 days after service of the summons and complaint. The defendant failed to file a responsive pleading in a timely manner. On March 27, 2018, an unsigned document titled Answer was submitted to the court on behalf of the defendant. (Docket no. 6). On March 28, 2018, the court entered an order striking the unsigned document and providing the defendant leave to obtain counsel and file a responsive pleading by April 6, 2018. (Docket no. 9). The defendant failed to file a responsive pleading as provided in the court's order and the plaintiffs filed their request for entry of default on April 9, 2018. (Docket no. 10). The Clerk of Court entered default against the defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) on April 10, 2018. (Docket no. 11).

On April 11, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a motion for default judgment, a memorandum in support of the motion for default judgment, and a notice setting a hearing for April 27, 2018. (Docket nos. 12-14). The motion for default judgment was supported with two affidavits from Toni C. Inscoe and a declaration by John R. Harney. (Docket no. 13). The motion for default judgment and supporting papers were served on the defendant by mail on April 11, 2018. (Docket nos. 12-14). On April 16, 2018, the court entered an order rescheduling the hearing on the motion for default judgment to Friday, May 4, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. and mailed a copy to the defendant. (Docket no. 15). On May 4, 2018, counsel for the plaintiffs appeared at the hearing on the motion for default judgment and no one appeared on behalf of the defendant.

Factual Background

The following facts are established by complaint (Docket no. 1) ("Compl.") and the affidavits and declaration attached as exhibits to the memorandum in support of the motion for default judgment (Docket no. 13). The Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and the Trustees of the International Training Fund are trustees of multi-employer employee benefit plans as defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(3) and (37). (Compl. 1, 2). The National Pension Fund is established and maintained by a Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust and by a Collective Bargaining Agreement between the United Association Local Union No. 145 and the defendant. (Compl. ¶ 1). The International Training Fund is established and maintained by a Restated Trust Agreement and by a Collective Bargaining Agreement between the United Association Local Union No. 145 and the defendant. (Compl. ¶ 2). The National Pension Fund and the International Training Fund are administered in Alexandria, Virginia. (Compl. 1, 2). Altitude is a Colorado limited liability company with an office located in Grand Junction, Colorado. (Compl. 3). At all times herein, Altitude was an "employer in an industry affecting commerce" as defined by 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(5), (9), (11), (12) and (14); 29 U.S.C. §§ 142(1), (3) and 152(2); and 29 U.S.C. § 1001(a). (Compl. ¶ 3).

Plaintiffs bring this action under Sections 502 and 515 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132 and 1145, and under Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). (Compl. ¶ 4). Defendant is a signatory to the Commercial Joint Agreement by and between Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 145 and the Mechanical Contractors Association of Western Colorado ("Collective Bargaining Agreement") establishing the terms and conditions of employment for journeymen and apprentice plumbers and pipefitters employed by the defendant. (Compl. 5). Pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement, the defendant agreed to pay the National Pension Fund and the International Training Fund certain sums of money for each hour worked by employees of the defendant covered by the Collective Bargaining Agreement. (Comp]. ¶¶ 6, 7). Plaintiffs claim that the defendant employed certain employees covered under the Collective Bargaining Agreement and failed to make proper contributions to the National Pension Fund (Count I) and the International Training Fund (Count II) for work performed at the defendant's request. (Compl. ¶¶ 8, 9, 16).

Count I — National Pension Fund

In the complaint the National Pension Fund asserts that the defendant failed to pay the amounts owed for contributions for the months of December 2015 through December 2016. (Compl.119). The National Pension Fund alleges that the defendant failed to make contributions in the amount of $21,596.19 for the months of December 2015 through December 2016 pursuant to reports submitted by the defendant. (Compl. ¶ 10). The National Pension Fund also alleges that the defendant is bound to the Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust that provides in Article VI, Section 5 that an employer who fails to pay the amounts required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement on time shall be considered delinquent and may be assessed liquidated damages in the amount of 10% of the amount due if payment is not received by the due date. (Compl. 13). Furthermore, pursuant to the Restated Trust Agreement, interest is assessed at a rate of 12% per annum from the date the payment was due through the date of payment to the National Pension Fund. (Docket no. 13-1, Inscoe Affid. 10). As set forth in the memorandum, the National Pension Fund seeks an award for unpaid contributions, liquated damages, accrued interest, and the attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action. (Docket no. 13).

Count II — International Training Fund

In the complaint, the International Training Fund alleges that the defendant failed to make contributions to the International Training Fund for the months of December 2015 through December 2016. (Compl. 116). The International Training Fund alleges that the defendant failed to make contributions in the amount of $692.50 for the months of December 2015 through December 2016 pursuant to reports submitted by the defendant. (Compl. ¶ 17). The International Training Fund also alleges that the defendant is bound to the Restated Trust Agreement that provides in Article VI, Section 6 that if an employer fails to file a report or make contributions within ten calendar days of the due date, the Trustees have the discretion to add liquidated damages in the amount of 20% of the amount due for each monthly report or payment past due to the amount owed by the employer. (Compl. 20). Pursuant to the Restated Trust Agreement, interest is assessed at a rate of 12% per annum from the due date through the date of payment to the International Training Fund. (Docket no. 13-2, lnscoe Affid. ¶ 11). As set forth in the memorandum, the International Training Fund seeks an award for unpaid contributions, liquated damages, accrued interest, and the attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action. (Docket no. 13).

Plaintiffs assert that pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2), they are entitled to a judgment awarding: (1) unpaid contributions; (2) liquidated damages; (3) interest; and (4) reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action.1

Proposed Findings and Recommendations

Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for the entry of a default judgment when "a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend." The court must have both subject matter and personal jurisdiction over a defaulting party before it can render a default judgment.

A defendant in default admits the factual allegations in the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(6) ("An allegation — other than one relating to the amount of damages — is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied."); see also GlobalSantaFe Corp. v. Globalsantafe.com, 250 F.Supp.2d 610, 612 n.3 (E.D. Va. 2003) ("Upon default, facts alleged in the complaint are deemed admitted and the appropriate inquiry is whether the facts as alleged state a claim."). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) provides that a court may conduct a hearing to determine the amount of damages, establish the truth of any allegation by evidence, or investigate any other matter.

Jurisdiction and Venue

Plaintiffs allege that this court has subject matter jurisdiction under Sections 502 and 515 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132 and 1145, and under Section 301 of the LMRA, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). ERISA Section 502 provides that U.S. district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions brought under this title. ERISA Section 515 states that employers bound by collective bargaining agreements or multi-employer plans shall make contributions in accordance with the terms of the plans or agreements. LMRA Section 301 provides jurisdiction in the U.S. district courts for suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization. This case is properly before the court under its federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e).

ERISA Section 502 states that an action under this title may be brought in the "district where the plan is administered" and "process may be served in any other district where a defendant resides or may be found." 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2). Each plaintiff states that it is administered in Alexandria, Virginia. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 2). On February 23, 2018, the summons and complaint were served in person on Paul W. Anderson, the registered agent for Altitude. (Docket no. 4). Venue is proper in this court and this court has personal jurisdiction over the defendant because each plaintiff fund is administered within the Alexandria Division of the Eastern District of Virginia and the defendant was served properly. See Bd of Trs., Sheet Metal Workers' Nat'l Pension Fund v. McD Metals, Inc., 964 F.Supp. 1040 (E.D. Va. 1997) (personal jurisdiction in an ERISA action should be determined on the basis of the defendant's national contacts with the United States pursuant to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and ERISA itself provides for nationwide service of process).

For these reasons, the undersigned magistrate judge recommends a finding that this court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, that the court has personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and that venue is proper in this court.

Grounds for Entry of Default

The complaint was served on Altitude on February 23, 2018. (Docket no. 4). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), a responsive pleading was due on March 16, 2018. On March 28, 2018, the court entered an order requiring the defendant to obtain legal counsel and file a responsive pleading by April 6, 2018. (Docket no. 9). After the defendant failed to file an answer or responsive pleading in a timely manner, the plaintiffs requested an entry of default on April 9, 2018. (Docket no. 10). The Clerk of Court entered a default on April 10, 2018. (Docket no. 11).

The undersigned magistrate judge recommends a finding that the defendant was served properly, that it failed to properly file a responsive pleading in a timely manner, and that the Clerk of Court properly entered a default as to the defendant.

Liability and Measure of Damages

According to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(c), a default judgment "must not differ in kind from, or exceed in amount, what is demanded in the pleadings." Because the defendant did not file a responsive pleading and is in default, the defendant admits the factual allegations in the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(6). As set forth in the affidavits in support of the motion for default judgment, the defendant has failed to pay the contributions owed for the months of December 2015 through December 2016 to the National Pension Fund and to the International Training Fund. ERISA Section 515 provides that in any action brought to enforce the payment of delinquent contributions in which a judgment in favor of the plan is awarded, the court shall award the plan:

(A) the unpaid contributions, (B) interest on the unpaid contributions, (C) an amount equal to the greater of — (i) interest on the unpaid contributions, or (ii) liquidated damages provided for under the plan in an amount not in excess of 20 percent (or such higher percentage as may be permitted under Federal or State law) of the amount determined by the court under subparagraph (A), (D) reasonable attorney's fees and costs of the action, to be paid by the defendant, and (E) such other legal or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate.

29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2).

In support of its claim for damages, the National Pension Fund submitted an affidavit of Toni Inscoe with the memorandum. (Docket no. 13-1). The International Training Fund also submitted an affidavit of Toni Inscoe with memorandum. (Docket no. 13-2). In addition to the affidavits from Ms. Inscoe, the National Pension Fund submitted a declaration from John R. Harney detailing the attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action. (Docket no. 13-3).

The information contained in the affidavit of Toni Inscoe submitted on behalf of the National Pension Fund establishes that the National Pension Fund is owed unpaid contributions for the months of December 2015 through December 2016 in the amount of $21,596.19, liquidated damages in the amount of $2,159.62 (calculated at 10% of the contributions found to be paid late), and interest at the rate of 12% from the date the payments were due through April 13, 2018, totaling $4,354.08. In addition, the Hamey declaration details the fees and costs incurred on behalf of the National Pension Fund in this matter. As shown in the attachment to the Harney declaration, the total amount of fees requested is $2,422.50 for 13.25 hours of attorney and paralegal time and the amount of costs requested is $556.29 for the filing fee, process server fee, and computerized research. The undersigned has reviewed the Harney declaration and the supporting documentation and recommends that the court find that the $2,422.50 requested for fees and the $556.29 requested for costs by the National Pension Fund are reasonable and should be paid by the defendant.2

For these reasons, the undersigned recommends that a default judgment be entered in favor of the National Pension Fund against the defendant in the amounts shown below.504499509504490513504499

Delinquent Contributions $21,596.19 Liquidated Damages $2,159.62 Accrued Interest $4,354.08 Attorney's Fees $2,422.50 Costs $556.29 Total $31,088.68

The information contained in the affidavit of Ms. Inscoe submitted on behalf of the International Training Fund establishes that the International Training Fund is owed unpaid contributions for the months of December 2015 through December 2016 in the amount of $692.50, liquidated damages in the amount of $138.50 (calculated at 20% of the contributions found to be paid late), and interest at the rate of 12% from the date the payments were due through April 13, 2018, totaling $142.17.

For these reasons, the undersigned recommends that a default judgment be entered in favor of the International Training Fund against the defendant in the amounts shown below.499499504451499499

Delinquent Contributions $692.50 Liquidated Damages $138.50 Accrued Interest $142.17 Total $973.17

For the reasons stated above the undersigned recommends that a default judgment be entered in favor of the Trustees of the National Pension Fund against the defendant on Count 1 of the complaint in the amount of 531,088.68 and that a default judgment he entered in favor of the Trustees of the International Training Fund against the defendant on Count II of the complaint in the amount of 5973.17.

Notice

By means of the court's electronic filing system and by mailing a copy of this proposed findings of fact and recommendations to Paul W. Anderson, Registered Agent, Altitude 24/7 Plumbing `leafing Cooling LTD, 751 Horizon Court #123-127, Grand Junction. Colorado 81506, the parties are notified that objections to this proposed findings of fact and recommendations must be filed within fourteen (14) days of service of this proposed findings of fact and recommendations and a failure to file timely objections waives appellate review of the substance of the proposed findings of fact and recommendations and waives appellate review of any judgment or decision based on this proposed findings of fact and recommendations.

FootNotes


1. In Count III plaintiffs seek an order enjoining the violations of the terms of the employee benefit plans and requiring the defendant to submit timely contributions and remittance reports to each plaintiff. Plaintiffs have not pursued their request for injunctive relief in the motion for default judgment.
2. The Harney declaration does not comply fully with the standards set forth in Grissom v. The Mills Corp., 549 F.3d 313, 320-23 (4th Cir. 2008), Barber v. Kimbrell's Inc., 577 F.2d 216, 226 (4th Cir. 1978), and Plyler v. Evatt, 902 F.2d 273, 277 (4th Cir. 1990) for establishing a reasonable fee award. However, because the defendant has not contested the requested amount of fees in this case, the court will accept the allegations set forth by the National Pension Fund concerning the reasonableness of these fees as true. The amount of the fees and costs requested are consistent with fees and costs incurred and awarded by this court in similar cases.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer