CONSTABLE v. ASTRUE, 5:11cv00023. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia
Number: infdco20120613d59
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge. In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED that the magistrate judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 11) is GRANTED, the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 17) is DENIED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration consistent herewith pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
ORDER
MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge.
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED that the magistrate judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 11) is GRANTED, the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 17) is DENIED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration consistent herewith pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
