PACE v. WARDEN, 7:13cv00171. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia
Number: infdco20130812953
Visitors: 26
Filed: Aug. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2013
Summary: ORDER NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this day, it is hereby ordered that respondent's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED ; the above referenced 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition is DISMISSED ; and this action is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. Further, finding that Pace has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1), a certificate of appealability is
Summary: ORDER NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this day, it is hereby ordered that respondent's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED ; the above referenced 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition is DISMISSED ; and this action is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. Further, finding that Pace has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1), a certificate of appealability is D..
More
ORDER
NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge.
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this day, it is hereby ordered that respondent's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED; the above referenced 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is DISMISSED; and this action is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court.
Further, finding that Pace has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1), a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion to petitioner and counsel for respondent.
Source: Leagle
