Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STASIS, INC. v. SCHURTZ, 5:11cv00117. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia Number: infdco20140825b83 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge. This matter was referred to the Honorable Robert S. Ballou, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on July 9, 2014, recommending that defendant Joel Schurtz's petition to enforce settlement agreement be granted. Specifically, the magistrate judge recommended entering judgment against STaSIS, Inc., in the a
More

ORDER

MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge.

This matter was referred to the Honorable Robert S. Ballou, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on July 9, 2014, recommending that defendant Joel Schurtz's petition to enforce settlement agreement be granted. Specifically, the magistrate judge recommended entering judgment against STaSIS, Inc., in the amount of $18,750.00.

No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the court is of the opinion that the report and recommendation should be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the court hereby GRANTS defendants' motion petition to enforce settlement agreement, Dkt. No. 90, and ADOPTS in totothe report and recommendation, Dkt. No. 99. Furthermore, judgment is hereby ENTERED in favor of Joel Schurtz against STaSIS, Inc., in the amount of $18,750.00.

It is ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff and to all counsel of record.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer