Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Van Buren, 3:00-cr-00066001. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia Number: infdco20160422a22
Filed: Mar. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2016
Summary: ORDER NORMAN K. MOON , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, Defendant's "motion to have heard new substantive rule per the Court's discretion" (dkt. 114) and "Rule 36 Motion" (dkt. 115) are DENIED . The Clerk is instructed to send a copy of this Order to Van Buren.

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, Defendant's "motion to have heard new substantive rule per the Court's discretion" (dkt. 114) and "Rule 36 Motion" (dkt. 115) are DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to send a copy of this Order to Van Buren.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer