Woodhouse v. Duncan, 7:17-CV-00129. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia
Number: infdco20180116e85
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2017
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL F. URBANSKI , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion entered this date, plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 9) is DENIED, the report and recommendation (ECF No. 42) is ADOPTED in its entirety, and plaintiff's objections to the report (ECF No. 46) are OVERRULED. It is SO ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order and the Memorandum Opinion to the pro se plaintiff and to counsel
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL F. URBANSKI , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion entered this date, plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 9) is DENIED, the report and recommendation (ECF No. 42) is ADOPTED in its entirety, and plaintiff's objections to the report (ECF No. 46) are OVERRULED. It is SO ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order and the Memorandum Opinion to the pro se plaintiff and to counsel ..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion entered this date, plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 9) is DENIED, the report and recommendation (ECF No. 42) is ADOPTED in its entirety, and plaintiff's objections to the report (ECF No. 46) are OVERRULED.
It is SO ORDERED.
The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order and the Memorandum Opinion to the pro se plaintiff and to counsel of record.
Source: Leagle
