Daniel C. v. Berryhill, 5:17-cv-00074. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Virginia
Number: infdco20190122873
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL F. URBANSKI , Chief District Judge . This matter was referred to the Honorable Joel C. Hoppe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendations on December 28, 2018, recommending that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be granted, the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment be denied, and the case be remanded for further consider
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL F. URBANSKI , Chief District Judge . This matter was referred to the Honorable Joel C. Hoppe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendations on December 28, 2018, recommending that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be granted, the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment be denied, and the case be remanded for further considera..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, Chief District Judge.
This matter was referred to the Honorable Joel C. Hoppe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendations on December 28, 2018, recommending that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be granted, the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment be denied, and the case be remanded for further consideration by the Administrative Law Judge. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the court is of the opinion that the report and recommendations should be adopted in its entirety.
As such, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The report and recommendation as amended (ECF No. 27) is ADOPTED in its entirety;
2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED;
3. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 21) is DENIED;
4. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the report and recommendation; and
5. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of the court.
Source: Leagle
