Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Baptiste v. Rohn, 2013-0104. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Virgin Islands Number: infdco20160331b13 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILMA A. LEWIS , Chief District Judge . UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant's "Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence of Loss of Wages, Loss of Earning Capacity, Past or Future Medical Expenses or Permanency of Injuries" (Dkt. No. 53), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence of Loss of Wages is DENIED ; and it is further ORDERED that Plai
More

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant's "Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence of Loss of Wages, Loss of Earning Capacity, Past or Future Medical Expenses or Permanency of Injuries" (Dkt. No. 53), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, filed contemporaneously herewith, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence of Loss of Wages is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff will be permitted to introduce otherwise admissible evidence at trial pertaining to her lost wages; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence of Loss of Earning Capacity, Past or Future Medical Expenses or Permanency of Injuries is DENIED AS MOOT; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to Plaintiff's representation in her Opposition, Plaintiff will not introduce at trial any evidence of damages relating to her (1) future medical expenses, (2) loss of earning capacity, and (3) permanency of injuries; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to Plaintiff's representations at trial, Plaintiff will not introduce any evidence of past medical expenses.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer