ORDER

CURTIS V. GÓMEZ, District Judge.

Before the Court is Tamisha McBean's motion to disqualify the undersigned.

Tamisha McBean ("McBean") argues that the undersigned must be removed from this case because the undersigned has exceeded ten years as a judge on the District Court of the Virgin Islands. McBean argues that the current case cannot proceed until a new judge is appointed to oversee the proceedings.

The Revised Organic Act, in pertinent part, provides that the term of appointment for a judge of the District Court of the Virgin Islands is "ten years and until their successors are chosen and qualified, unless sooner removed by the President for cause." 48 U.S.C. § 1614(a) (emphasis added). Given that context, the remedy suggested by McBean is only possible if one were to ignore the conjunctive language "and until," that immediately follows the words "ten years."

Of course, the Court is required to give meaning to each word in a statute and to read the statute as a whole. Tavarez v. Klingensmith, 372 F.3d 188, 190 (3d Cir. 2004). It would be verboten to do otherwise in interpreting a statute. Applying well-established principles of statutory construction to the Revised Organic Act, the statutory language is very clear. The ten-year period referred to in the Revised Organic Act is a floor for a district judge's term. It is not a cap. See 18 U.S.C. § 1614(a). In short, the term is not finite. Indeed, only if a successor is chosen and qualified does the term end.1 48 U.S.C. § 1614(a).

The premises considered; it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion to disqualify is DENIED.