United States v. Girard, 2018-30. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Virgin Islands
Number: infdco20190801e57
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER CURTIS V. GOacute;MEZ , District Judge . On July 31, 2019, the Court held a status conference with the parties in this matter. At that conference, the Court questioned whether learned counsel should remain in this matter given the July 13, 2019, notice by the United States of its intent not to seek the death penalty as to any defendant. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that to the extent any defendant wishes to move to retain learned counsel in this matter, he shall d
Summary: ORDER CURTIS V. GOacute;MEZ , District Judge . On July 31, 2019, the Court held a status conference with the parties in this matter. At that conference, the Court questioned whether learned counsel should remain in this matter given the July 13, 2019, notice by the United States of its intent not to seek the death penalty as to any defendant. The premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that to the extent any defendant wishes to move to retain learned counsel in this matter, he shall do..
More
ORDER
CURTIS V. GOacute;MEZ, District Judge.
On July 31, 2019, the Court held a status conference with the parties in this matter. At that conference, the Court questioned whether learned counsel should remain in this matter given the July 13, 2019, notice by the United States of its intent not to seek the death penalty as to any defendant.
The premises considered, it is hereby
ORDERED that to the extent any defendant wishes to move to retain learned counsel in this matter, he shall do so by no later than 12:00 P.M. on August 2, 2019; to the extent a defendant's motion contains attorney-client privileged information, that defendant is permitted to file his motion ex parte and under seal; to the extent a defendant's motion does not contain attorney-client privileged information, that defendant shall file his motion on the open docket.
Source: Leagle
