Filed: Jul. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM K. SESSIONS, III, District Judge. The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed June 26, 2012. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report. The petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 3) is DENIED; that his motion to stay lower court proceedi
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM K. SESSIONS, III, District Judge. The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed June 26, 2012. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report. The petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 3) is DENIED; that his motion to stay lower court proceedin..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM K. SESSIONS, III, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed June 26, 2012. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.
The petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 3) is DENIED; that his motion to stay lower court proceedings (Doc. 4) be DENIED as moot; that Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) be GRANTED; that Respondent's supplemental motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is DENIED as moot. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 22(b), a certificate of appealability is DENIED because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of denial of a federal right. Furthermore, the petitioner's grounds for relief do not present issues which are debatable among jurists of reasons, which could have been resolved differently, or which deserve further proceedings. See e.g., Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3rd 878, 882-83 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 513 U.S. 946 (1994); Sawyer v. Collins, 986 F.2d 1493, 1497 (5th cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 933 (1993).
Furthermore, it is certified that any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
THIS CASE IS CLOSED.
