Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McGARRY v. PALLITO, 1:09-cv-128. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Vermont Number: infdco20130703e75 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2013
Summary: ORDER J. GARVAN MURTHA, District Judge. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed May 22, 2013. (Doc. 57.) After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to allege physical injury (Doc. 54) is DENIED. In addition, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on the basis of personal involvement (Doc. 54) is GRANTED with respect to Defendants Sorrell,
More

ORDER

J. GARVAN MURTHA, District Judge.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed May 22, 2013. (Doc. 57.) After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to allege physical injury (Doc. 54) is DENIED. In addition, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on the basis of personal involvement (Doc. 54) is GRANTED with respect to Defendants Sorrell, Cannon, "CO Forcier," Santos, Liff and "Various Attorneys," but is DENIED as it relates to all remaining Defendants. In adopting the R&R, the Court has determined Plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts to withstand the motion to dismiss and is entitled to offer evidence to support his claim. The Court has made no factual determinations.

This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer