Filed: May 22, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } In re: Appeal of } Edward Deptula } Docket No. 9-1-00 Vtec } } Decision and Order on Motion to Dismiss Town as Party Appellant Edward Deptula appealed from a decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) of the Town of Montgomery granting a permit to Appellee-Applicant Joseph Nastasi to operate a machine shop. Appellant represents himself; Appellee- Applicant also represents himself; the Town of Montgomery is represented by Amanda S.E. Lafferty, Esq. App
Summary: STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } In re: Appeal of } Edward Deptula } Docket No. 9-1-00 Vtec } } Decision and Order on Motion to Dismiss Town as Party Appellant Edward Deptula appealed from a decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) of the Town of Montgomery granting a permit to Appellee-Applicant Joseph Nastasi to operate a machine shop. Appellant represents himself; Appellee- Applicant also represents himself; the Town of Montgomery is represented by Amanda S.E. Lafferty, Esq. Appe..
More
STATE OF VERMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
}
In re: Appeal of }
Edward Deptula } Docket No. 9-1-00 Vtec
}
}
Decision and Order on Motion to Dismiss Town as Party
Appellant Edward Deptula appealed from a decision of the Zoning Board of
Adjustment (ZBA) of the Town of Montgomery granting a permit to Appellee-Applicant
Joseph Nastasi to operate a machine shop. Appellant represents himself; Appellee-
Applicant also represents himself; the Town of Montgomery is represented by Amanda
S.E. Lafferty, Esq. Appellant has moved to dismiss the Town as a party.
Appellant argues that the Town has no standing to participate as an interested party,
because neither the town plan nor a town ordinance is "at issue" in this case, citing
Sabourin v. Town of Essex,
146 Vt. 419, 420-21 (1985) and Rossetti v. Chittenden County
Transportation Authority,
165 Vt. 61, 66 (1990). In those decisions, the Vermont Supreme
Court ruled that a town may not bring an appeal challenging the wisdom of a zoning
decision. However, a town may appeal (and may participate in an appeal brought by
another) if there is a claim that the ZBA Aexceeded its authority or misconstrued a bylaw
provision.@ Rossetti v. Chittenden County Transportation Authority,
165 Vt. 61, 66 (1990).
The Court stated that A[w]ithout such a claim, we do not believe the bylaw was Aat issue@ as
that term is used in 24 V.S.A. '4464(b)(2).@
With such a claim, therefore, a bylaw is Aat issue@ to give the Town standing as an
interested person. In the present case, Appellant claims that the ZBA misconstrued the
bylaw=s provisions defining Ahome occupation@ and Alight industry,@ and requests damages
and court costs. These claims give the Town standing to participate as a party in the
appeal.
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, Appellant=s Motion to Dismiss the Town as an
Interested Party is DENIED. We will hold a conference BY TELEPHONE in this matter on
1
June 15, 2000 to discuss scheduling this appeal for a hearing.
Done at Barre, Vermont, this 22nd day of May, 2000.
_________________________________________________
Merideth Wright
Environmental Judge
2