COLE, SCHOTZ, MEISEL, FORMAN & LEONARD, P.A. v. STANTON CRENSHAW COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, 88 A.D.3d 452 (2011)
Court: Supreme Court of New York
Number: innyco20111004238
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 04, 2011
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2011
Summary: The stipulation on which defendants rely does not clearly and unambiguously manifest an intent on plaintiff's part to release defendants from future rent obligations under the lease ( see Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co., 70 N.Y.2d 966 , 968 [1988]; NAB Constr. Corp. v City of New York, 276 A.D.2d 388 [2000]). We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
The stipulation on which defendants rely does not clearly and unambiguously manifest an intent on plaintiff's part to release defendants from future rent obligations under the lease (see Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co., 70 N.Y.2d 966, 968 [1988]; NAB Constr. Corp. v City of New York, 276 A.D.2d 388 [2000]).
We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Source: Leagle
