Filed: Mar. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2014
Summary: In three related custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner, Tyeisha H., a cousin of the mother of the subject children, appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Schauer, J.), entered August 16, 2012, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petitions for custody of the subject children. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petitions are reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, W
Summary: In three related custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner, Tyeisha H., a cousin of the mother of the subject children, appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Schauer, J.), entered August 16, 2012, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petitions for custody of the subject children. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petitions are reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, We..
More
In three related custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner, Tyeisha H., a cousin of the mother of the subject children, appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Schauer, J.), entered August 16, 2012, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petitions for custody of the subject children.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petitions are reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings consistent herewith; in the interim, the subject children shall remain with their current foster family.
For the reasons stated in our decision and order on a related appeal (see Matter of Leval B. v Kiona E. (115 A.D.3d 665 [2014] [decided herewith]), the order must be reversed, the petitions reinstated, and the matter remitted to the Family Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings.
