DEUTSCHE BANK NATL. TRUST CO. v. WILLIAMS, 134 A.D.3d 981 (2015)
Court: Supreme Court of New York
Number: innyco20151223553
Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2015
Summary: Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the appellant's contention, under the circumstances of this case, the referee was not required to conduct a hearing prior to issuing his report to the Supreme Court ( see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Zlotoff, 77 A.D.3d 702 [2010]; Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Jackson, 68 A.D.3d 805 [2009]). The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, under the circumstances of this case, the referee was not required to conduct a hearing prior to issuing his report to the Supreme Court (see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Zlotoff, 77 A.D.3d 702 [2010]; Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Jackson, 68 A.D.3d 805 [2009]).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Source: Leagle
