PEOPLE v. DELGADO, 135 A.D.3d 953 (2016)
Court: Supreme Court of New York
Number: innyco20160127376
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2016
Summary: Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California ( 386 U.S. 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted ( see Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 2
Summary: Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California ( 386 U.S. 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted ( see Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 25..
More
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 U.S. 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606 [1979]).
Source: Leagle
