Lahtinen, J.
The issues in this Medicaid reimbursement case are largely controlled by a series of recent decisions of this Court, which were decided after Supreme Court's decision. Although Supreme Court incorrectly declared that the 2012 amendment to the Medicaid Cap Statute (see L 2012, ch 56, § 1, part D, § 61) was unconstitutional (see Matter of County of St. Lawrence v Shah, 124 A.D.3d 88, 92 [2014], lv granted 25 N.Y.3d 903 [2015]; see also Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 124 A.D.3d 963, 964 [2015], lv granted 25 N.Y.3d 903 [2015]), it properly concluded that petitioner was entitled to reimbursement for pre-2006 overburden expenses since such claims were submitted within the six-month grace period (see Matter of County of Broome v Shah, 130 A.D.3d 1347, 1347 [2015]; Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 124 AD3d at 964). "[R]espondents' challenge to petitioner's capacity to bring this claim was waived by respondents' failure to raise capacity as a defense in their answer or a pre-answer motion to dismiss" (Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 124 AD3d at 964; see Matter of County of Broome v Shah, 130 AD3d at 1347-1348). Finally, we agree with respondents that Supreme Court erred in directing them to pay interest on the reimbursement payments (see Signature Health Ctr., LLC v State of New York, 92 A.D.3d 11, 17 [2011], lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 811 [2012]; Concourse Nursing Home v State of New York, 1 A.D.3d 675, 677 [2003], lv denied 2 N.Y.3d 704 [2004]).
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as (1) declared L 2012, ch 56, § 1, part D,
