STATE v. HIGGINS, 78972-4-I. (2019)
Court: Court of Appeals of Washington
Number: inwaco20190716g61
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED OPINION PER CURIAM . Marty Higgins appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for residential burglary. He contends, and the State concedes, that the sentencing court exceeded its authority in prohibiting contact with Clifford Wilson for 20 years because the statutory maximum for his offense is 10 years. RCW 9A.52.025 (2); RCW 9A.20.021 (1) (b). We accept the State's concession and remand for amendment of the judgment and sentence. LEACH, SMITH and VERELLEN, JJ., conc
Summary: UNPUBLISHED OPINION PER CURIAM . Marty Higgins appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for residential burglary. He contends, and the State concedes, that the sentencing court exceeded its authority in prohibiting contact with Clifford Wilson for 20 years because the statutory maximum for his offense is 10 years. RCW 9A.52.025 (2); RCW 9A.20.021 (1) (b). We accept the State's concession and remand for amendment of the judgment and sentence. LEACH, SMITH and VERELLEN, JJ., concu..
More
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Marty Higgins appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for residential burglary. He contends, and the State concedes, that the sentencing court exceeded its authority in prohibiting contact with Clifford Wilson for 20 years because the statutory maximum for his offense is 10 years. RCW 9A.52.025 (2); RCW 9A.20.021 (1) (b). We accept the State's concession and remand for amendment of the judgment and sentence.
LEACH, SMITH and VERELLEN, JJ., concurs.
Source: Leagle
