STATE v. PITTMAN, 79056-1-I. (2019)
Court: Court of Appeals of Washington
Number: inwaco20190820i30
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED OPINION PER CURIAM . Steven Pittman appeals the DNA fee imposed as part of his sentence for unlawful possession of methamphetamine and unlawful use of a building for drug purposes. He contends, and the State concedes, that the DNA fee must be stricken under RCW 43.43.7541 and State v. Ramirez , 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018) because he previously gave a DNA sample that is on file with the Washington State Patrol crime lab. We accept the concession of error and remand with
Summary: UNPUBLISHED OPINION PER CURIAM . Steven Pittman appeals the DNA fee imposed as part of his sentence for unlawful possession of methamphetamine and unlawful use of a building for drug purposes. He contends, and the State concedes, that the DNA fee must be stricken under RCW 43.43.7541 and State v. Ramirez , 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018) because he previously gave a DNA sample that is on file with the Washington State Patrol crime lab. We accept the concession of error and remand with d..
More
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Steven Pittman appeals the DNA fee imposed as part of his sentence for unlawful possession of methamphetamine and unlawful use of a building for drug purposes. He contends, and the State concedes, that the DNA fee must be stricken under RCW 43.43.7541 and State v. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018) because he previously gave a DNA sample that is on file with the Washington State Patrol crime lab. We accept the concession of error and remand with directions to strike the DNA fee from the judgment and sentence.
CHUN and ANDRUS, JJ., concurs.
Source: Leagle
