AVOCENT REDMOND CORP. v. ROSE ELECTRONICS, C06-1711RSL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20120605d37
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 29, 2012
Latest Update: May 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION AND EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINE ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the joint motion of plaintiff and the Aten defendants to withdraw Aten's pending motion for relief from deadline and to extend the deadline for Aten to provide their damage expert's rebuttal report. Dkt. # 488. Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds as follows: (1) Many of the issues raised in Aten's "Motion for Relief from Deadline a
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION AND EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINE ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the joint motion of plaintiff and the Aten defendants to withdraw Aten's pending motion for relief from deadline and to extend the deadline for Aten to provide their damage expert's rebuttal report. Dkt. # 488. Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds as follows: (1) Many of the issues raised in Aten's "Motion for Relief from Deadline an..
More
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION AND EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINE
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on the joint motion of plaintiff and the Aten defendants to withdraw Aten's pending motion for relief from deadline and to extend the deadline for Aten to provide their damage expert's rebuttal report. Dkt. # 488. Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds as follows:
(1) Many of the issues raised in Aten's "Motion for Relief from Deadline and to Compel or, in the Alternative, to Strike Avocent's Damage Expert Report of William Kerr" (Dkt. # 462) have been resolved by the parties without Court intervention. That motion is hereby withdrawn. The Clerk of Court is directed to remove Dkt. # 462 from the Court's motions calendar.
(2) Aten's damage expert's rebuttal report is due on May 21, 2012.
(3) Because the Aten defendants have withdrawn their motion for relief from deadline (Dkt. # 462), the Court has not considered that motion or its supporting papers. The public therefore has little to no interest in those documents, and they can remain sealed. Aten's "Motion to File Under Seal in Support of Aten's Motion for Relief from Deadline" (Dkt. # 460) is therefore GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
