Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HOISINGTON v. WILLIAMS, C13-5064 BHS/KLS. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20130626j01
Filed: Jun. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2013
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION KAREN L. STROMBOM, Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is the parties' Stipulation for Order of Dismissal. ECF No. 26. The parties state that this matter has been fully settled and compromised between them and stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice without costs. Id. Accordingly, it is recommended that this case be D ISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE without costs. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the parties shall have fourteen
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

KAREN L. STROMBOM, Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is the parties' Stipulation for Order of Dismissal. ECF No. 26. The parties state that this matter has been fully settled and compromised between them and stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice without costs. Id. Accordingly, it is recommended that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE without costs.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule 72(b), the Clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on June 21, 2013, as noted in the caption.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer