MARY ALICE THEILER, Chief Magistrate Judge.
The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of defendant as required and the safety of other persons and the community.
1. Defendant was arrested on August 27, 2013 when search and seizure warrants were served at the Travelers Choice Motel and Great Bear Motel in Tukwila, in which he has an ownership interest. Defendant is a naturalized citizen of the U.S. He has some family ties to India and has traveled to India approximately 5 to 6 times since entering the United States at age eighteen. His criminal record includes charges for obstructing a public officer and making a false statement to a public servant, both of which were dismissed after entering into a stipulated order of continuance and performing community service or unsupervised probation. Defendant was convicted of assault in the 4th degree and obstructing a law enforcement officer in 2010. The AUSA proffers an allegation that defendant attempted to communicate with another co-defendant after arrest on the instant charges, urging him to not talk to law enforcement.
2. The government alleges that defendant was not truthful to pretrial services about substance abuse and is a user of methamphetamine. They allege that methamphetamine was observed in defendant's vehicle by a law enforcement officer who was present at the motel premises investigating the discovery of a dead body.
3. Cash in the amount of $131,000 was seized from defendant's residence at the time of arrest and his residence has been identified as a forfeitable asset in the pending criminal case. A number of other bank accounts were also seized and are subject to a forfeiture action.
4. Defendant poses a risk of nonappearance due to ties to India and recent travel, as well as access to large amounts of cash. He poses a risk of danger due to alleged substance abuse and criminal history.
5. There does not appear to be any condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance at future Court hearings while addressing the danger to other persons or the community.
It is therefore ORDERED: