JONES v. U.S., C13-1929JLR. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20140404691
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge. Before the court are two motions brought by the United States of America: (1) a motion regarding waiver of attorney-client privilege (Dkt. # 7); and (2) a motion for extension of time (Dkt. # 11). The court recently appointed Mr. Robert Gombiner to assist Plaintiff Darrell Jones in responding to the attorney-client privilege motion. ( See Dkt. # 12.) Mr. Gombiner is directed to confer with Mr. Jones within 7 days of the date of this order to discuss the
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge. Before the court are two motions brought by the United States of America: (1) a motion regarding waiver of attorney-client privilege (Dkt. # 7); and (2) a motion for extension of time (Dkt. # 11). The court recently appointed Mr. Robert Gombiner to assist Plaintiff Darrell Jones in responding to the attorney-client privilege motion. ( See Dkt. # 12.) Mr. Gombiner is directed to confer with Mr. Jones within 7 days of the date of this order to discuss the m..
More
ORDER
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
Before the court are two motions brought by the United States of America: (1) a motion regarding waiver of attorney-client privilege (Dkt. # 7); and (2) a motion for extension of time (Dkt. # 11). The court recently appointed Mr. Robert Gombiner to assist Plaintiff Darrell Jones in responding to the attorney-client privilege motion. (See Dkt. # 12.) Mr. Gombiner is directed to confer with Mr. Jones within 7 days of the date of this order to discuss the motion. Mr. Gombiner is also directed to file a response to the Government's attorney-client privilege motion within 10 days after conferring with Mr. Jones. The Government is permitted to file a rebuttal within seven days after the response is filed. Last, the court directs the Clerk to re-note the attorney-client privilege motion (Dkt. # 7) to April 11, 2014. In light of this, the court also GRANTS the Government's second motion for an extension of time (Dkt. # 11). The Government's response to Mr. Jones' underlying § 2255 motion will be due 21 days after the court rules on the motion for attorney-client privilege waiver.
Source: Leagle
