WAY v. COLVIN, 2:14-cv-00119-LRS. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20141015k24
Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2014
Summary: ORDER LONNY R. SUKO, Senior District Judge. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings, including further development of the record, a new hearing, and a new decision. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will: (1) further evaluate the medical opinion evidence pursuant to 20 CFR 416.927 and Social Security Rulings (SSRs) 96-2p, 96-5p, and 96-6p; (2)
Summary: ORDER LONNY R. SUKO, Senior District Judge. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings, including further development of the record, a new hearing, and a new decision. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will: (1) further evaluate the medical opinion evidence pursuant to 20 CFR 416.927 and Social Security Rulings (SSRs) 96-2p, 96-5p, and 96-6p; (2) ..
More
ORDER
LONNY R. SUKO, Senior District Judge.
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings, including further development of the record, a new hearing, and a new decision.
On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will: (1) further evaluate the medical opinion evidence pursuant to 20 CFR § 416.927 and Social Security Rulings (SSRs) 96-2p, 96-5p, and 96-6p; (2) evaluate Ms. Russell's opinion pursuant to 20 CFR § 416.913(d) and SSR 06-03p; (3) reevaluate the claimant's subjective complaints pursuant 20 CFR § 416.929 and SSR 96-7p; (4) reassess the claimant's residual functional capacity pursuant to 20 CFR § 416.945 and SSRs 85-16 and 96-8p; (5) and if warranted, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert evidence to clarify the effect of the assessed limitations on the occupational base.
This case is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon proper presentation, this Court will consider Plaintiff's application for costs, expenses, and reasonable attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a),(d).
Source: Leagle
