Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ENERTECHNIX, INC. v. SYN-FAB, INC., C15-744 RSL. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20150908716 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT SYN-FAB, INC. TO FILE A SUPPLEMENT AL REPLY NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: July 13, 2015 ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . STIPULATION COME NOW plaintiff Enertechnix, Inc. and defendant Syn-Fab, Inc., through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate as follows: Upon reviewing Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. #15), plaintiff's counsel discovered the wrong document was attached as Exh
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT SYN-FAB, INC. TO FILE A SUPPLEMENT AL REPLY

NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: July 13, 2015

STIPULATION

COME NOW plaintiff Enertechnix, Inc. and defendant Syn-Fab, Inc., through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate as follows:

Upon reviewing Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. #15), plaintiff's counsel discovered the wrong document was attached as Exhibit E to the Declaration of George Kychakoff. So, plaintiff's counsel submitted the correct Exhibit E with a Praecipe (Dkt. #17). To permit defendant to respond to the replacement Exhibit E, the parties have agreed that defendant may file a supplemental reply in support of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction strictly limited to the replacement Exhibit E. Defendant's supplemental reply shall not exceed three pages and shall be filed within 24 hours of the Court entering the order below.

ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the foregoing Stipulation of the parties and the Court finding good cause, now therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that within 24 hours of the entry of this Order, defendant may file a supplemental reply in support of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The supplemental reply shall not exceed three pages and shall be strictly limited to the replacement Exhibit E plaintiff filed on July 10, 2015.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward this Order to counsel of record.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer