ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
THE COURT, having considered the stipulated motion to continue the trial dates and pretrial motions deadline (Dkt. # 40), and the records and files herein, including the defendants' waivers of their speedy trial rights (Dkt. ## 41, 43, 46
1. Failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of trial and other pretrial proceedings, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
2. Failure to grant a continuance would likely result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i).
3. The ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
4. The defendants in this matter, at this time, are joined for trial with one or more codefendant as to whom the time for trial has not run and no motion for severance has been granted, all within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6).
5. The period of time from the filing date of the stipulated motion until the new trial date, set forth below, shall be excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial dates in this case are continued from March 6 and March 13, 2017, to October 2, 2017. The deadline for pretrial motions in this case is set for July 28, 2017.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the time period between the original trial dates and October 2, 2017, shall be excludable time pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) for the purposes of computing the time limitations imposed by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161-74.