Filed: Feb. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING T-MOBILE USA, INC.'S MOTION TO SEAL RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile") has moved, pursuant to Local Civil Rule(g) to seal portions of its Opposition to Huawei Device USA, Inc.'s ("Huawei USA") Motion in Limine ("T-Mobile's Opposition"), and D, E, G, J and Q cited in T-Mobile's Opposition and attached to the Declaration of Steven N. Feldman in Support of T-Mobile's Opposition ("Feldman Decl."). Having considered the Motion to Seal (Dk
Summary: ORDER GRANTING T-MOBILE USA, INC.'S MOTION TO SEAL RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile") has moved, pursuant to Local Civil Rule(g) to seal portions of its Opposition to Huawei Device USA, Inc.'s ("Huawei USA") Motion in Limine ("T-Mobile's Opposition"), and D, E, G, J and Q cited in T-Mobile's Opposition and attached to the Declaration of Steven N. Feldman in Support of T-Mobile's Opposition ("Feldman Decl."). Having considered the Motion to Seal (Dkt..
More
ORDER GRANTING T-MOBILE USA, INC.'S MOTION TO SEAL
RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiff T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile") has moved, pursuant to Local Civil Rule(g) to seal portions of its Opposition to Huawei Device USA, Inc.'s ("Huawei USA") Motion in Limine ("T-Mobile's Opposition"), and D, E, G, J and Q cited in T-Mobile's Opposition and attached to the Declaration of Steven N. Feldman in Support of T-Mobile's Opposition ("Feldman Decl."). Having considered the Motion to Seal (Dkt. # 342), the supporting Declaration of Xinlin Li Morrow (Dkt. # 343), Huawei USA's response, T-Mobile's reply, and being fully advised,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Seal for Exhibits D, E, G, J and Q to the Feldman Decl. is GRANTED and the clerk is directed to maintain the above-listed items under seal.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Seal portions of T-Mobile's Opposition is GRANTED.
