Vopnford v. WellCare Health Plans, 2:16-cv-01835-JLR. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20170515b05
Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead [CLERK'S ACTION REQUIRED] JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Before this Court is the Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead brought by Defendants Comprehensive Health Management, Inc., Tom Potts, Frank Webster, Lydia Ophaug, Ray McComb, and Kaleista Lagarde (collectively, Defendants ). Defendants informed Plaintiff's counsel via email of their intent to request 30 addition
Summary: [PROPOSED] Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead [CLERK'S ACTION REQUIRED] JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Before this Court is the Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead brought by Defendants Comprehensive Health Management, Inc., Tom Potts, Frank Webster, Lydia Ophaug, Ray McComb, and Kaleista Lagarde (collectively, Defendants ). Defendants informed Plaintiff's counsel via email of their intent to request 30 additiona..
More
[PROPOSED]
Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead
[CLERK'S ACTION REQUIRED]
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
Before this Court is the Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead brought by Defendants Comprehensive Health Management, Inc., Tom Potts, Frank Webster, Lydia Ophaug, Ray McComb, and Kaleista Lagarde (collectively, Defendants). Defendants informed Plaintiff's counsel via email of their intent to request 30 additional days to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, and one of Plaintiff's counsel responded that he had no objection to the request.
The Court grants Defendants' request. Defendants may now answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint on or before May 18, 2017.
Source: Leagle
