Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CITY OF SEATTLE v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C16-107-RSL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20170525e88 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 24, 2017
Latest Update: May 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Stay Briefing on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. # 73. The Court has specifically reviewed the following: 1. Defendants' Motion to Stay Briefing on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss to Stay Briefing on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss; 2. Plaintiff's opposition; and 3. Defendants' reply. Being fully advised and
More

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Stay Briefing on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. # 73. The Court has specifically reviewed the following:

1. Defendants' Motion to Stay Briefing on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss to Stay Briefing on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss;

2. Plaintiff's opposition; and

3. Defendants' reply.

Being fully advised and having reviewed the above, the Court concludes that it is in the interest of judicial economy to stay further briefing of Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss, and consideration of the motion itself, pending resolution of Defendants' Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaims, Dkt. # 76. If Defendants' Motion to Amend is ultimately denied, the Court will re-note Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss to allow Plaintiff an opportunity to file a reply brief. If Defendants' Motion to Amend is ultimately granted, Plaintiff may decide whether to file a revised motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Stay Briefing on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 73) is GRANTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer