Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CITY OF SEATTLE v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C16-107RSL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20170712925 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE AND LEAVE TO FILE OVER-LENGTH MOTION ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's stipulated motion for relief from a deadline and for permission to file an over-length motion. Dkt. ## 82, 83. 1 Being fully advised, the Court ORDERS that plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file its motion under Rule 12 on or before July 27, 2017, or no more than twenty-one days after defendants fil
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE AND LEAVE TO FILE OVER-LENGTH MOTION

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's stipulated motion for relief from a deadline and for permission to file an over-length motion. Dkt. ## 82, 83.1 Being fully advised, the Court ORDERS that plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file its motion under Rule 12 on or before July 27, 2017, or no more than twenty-one days after defendants file their Amended Answer and Counter-Claims, whichever date is later. Plaintiff's motion (and defendants' response) may not exceed forty-eight pages in length. Plaintiff's reply may not exceed twenty-four pages in length.

FootNotes


1. Though plaintiff filed two separate motions, both seek the same relief and accordingly are considered together.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer