U.S. v. RENFROW, MC17-0066RSL. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20170830d85
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on defendant/judgment debtor's request for a hearing in the above-captioned garnishment action. Dkt. # 8. In light of defendant/judgment debtor's objections, the Clerk of Court is directed to give this matter a civil action number and assign it in rotation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3202(d) and 3205(c)(5), the requested hearing is to be held as soon as practicable. The Writ of Garnishment shall remain in effect dur
Summary: ORDER ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on defendant/judgment debtor's request for a hearing in the above-captioned garnishment action. Dkt. # 8. In light of defendant/judgment debtor's objections, the Clerk of Court is directed to give this matter a civil action number and assign it in rotation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3202(d) and 3205(c)(5), the requested hearing is to be held as soon as practicable. The Writ of Garnishment shall remain in effect duri..
More
ORDER
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant/judgment debtor's request for a hearing in the above-captioned garnishment action. Dkt. # 8. In light of defendant/judgment debtor's objections, the Clerk of Court is directed to give this matter a civil action number and assign it in rotation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3202(d) and § 3205(c)(5), the requested hearing is to be held as soon as practicable. The Writ of Garnishment shall remain in effect during the pendency of this action, but judgment shall not be entered absent further order of the Court.
Source: Leagle