Enstad v. PeaceHealth, 2:17-cv-01496-RSM. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20171213i33
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PEACEHEALTH'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion of Defendant PeaceHealth ("PeaceHealth"), through counsel, consented to by plaintiffs Cheryl and Pax Enstad, through counsel, to extend the time for PeaceHealth to respond to the Complaint; the Court having considered the Joint Motion, and finding good cause therefore, it is therefore: ORDERED t
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PEACEHEALTH'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion of Defendant PeaceHealth ("PeaceHealth"), through counsel, consented to by plaintiffs Cheryl and Pax Enstad, through counsel, to extend the time for PeaceHealth to respond to the Complaint; the Court having considered the Joint Motion, and finding good cause therefore, it is therefore: ORDERED th..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PEACEHEALTH'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion of Defendant PeaceHealth ("PeaceHealth"), through counsel, consented to by plaintiffs Cheryl and Pax Enstad, through counsel, to extend the time for PeaceHealth to respond to the Complaint; the Court having considered the Joint Motion, and finding good cause therefore, it is therefore:
ORDERED that the deadline for PeaceHealth to respond to the Complaint is extended to January 8, 2018.
Source: Leagle
