Sea Shepherd Legal v. Department of the Navy, C17-0720 RSM. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20171222a46
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2017
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND STATUS UPDATE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff SEA SHEPHERD LEGAL and Defendant DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (the Navy) hereby provide the Court with a Status Update pursuant to the Court's October 18, 2017 Order. (Dkt. No. 21). As the Court is aware, this suit pertains to Plaintiff's request under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") for certain documents related to Navy activity involving the endangered vaquita porp
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND STATUS UPDATE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff SEA SHEPHERD LEGAL and Defendant DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (the Navy) hereby provide the Court with a Status Update pursuant to the Court's October 18, 2017 Order. (Dkt. No. 21). As the Court is aware, this suit pertains to Plaintiff's request under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") for certain documents related to Navy activity involving the endangered vaquita porpo..
More
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND STATUS UPDATE
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff SEA SHEPHERD LEGAL and Defendant DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (the Navy) hereby provide the Court with a Status Update pursuant to the Court's October 18, 2017 Order. (Dkt. No. 21).
As the Court is aware, this suit pertains to Plaintiff's request under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") for certain documents related to Navy activity involving the endangered vaquita porpoise. Since Plaintiff filed the Complaint, the Navy has completed production of all requested documents. The parties have reached a tentative agreement, but are working to finalize the paperwork, which is complicated by holiday travel. Accordingly, the parties propose that they submit an additional update to the Court no later than January 18, 2018. To the extent that there are any developments warranting the imposition of a briefing schedule prior to that date, the parties will so inform the Court.
SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
