Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.,, C17-0814JLR. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20171228e64 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Before the court is the parties' stipulated motion for a protective order. (Stip. Mot. (Dkt. # 66).) The parties, however, fail to comply with Local Rule LCR 26(c)(2). See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 26(c)(2). Pursuant to this rule, "[p]arties are encouraged to use this district's model protective order, available on the court's website," but those "[p]arties that wish to depart from t
More

ORDER DENYING STIPULATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Before the court is the parties' stipulated motion for a protective order. (Stip. Mot. (Dkt. # 66).) The parties, however, fail to comply with Local Rule LCR 26(c)(2). See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 26(c)(2). Pursuant to this rule, "[p]arties are encouraged to use this district's model protective order, available on the court's website," but those "[p]arties that wish to depart from the model order must provide the court with a redlined version identifying departures from the model." Id. Here, the parties appear to use the model protective order as a basis for their filing, but they fail to provide the court a redlined version as required under the local rules. Accordingly, the court DENIES the parties' stipulated motion for a protective order (Dkt. # 66), but without prejudice to re-filing in a manner that comports with the court's local rules.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer