Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING NOTING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS [DKT. 10] RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Plaintiffs and Defendants CF Arcis VII LLC, CF Arcis IV Holdings, LLC, Arcis Equity Partners, LLC, and Blake Walker (the "Arcis Defendants"), by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On January 19, 2018, the Arcis Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Dkt. 10. The Arcis Defendants noted the m
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING NOTING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS [DKT. 10] RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Plaintiffs and Defendants CF Arcis VII LLC, CF Arcis IV Holdings, LLC, Arcis Equity Partners, LLC, and Blake Walker (the "Arcis Defendants"), by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On January 19, 2018, the Arcis Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Dkt. 10. The Arcis Defendants noted the mo..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING NOTING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS [DKT. 10]
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiffs and Defendants CF Arcis VII LLC, CF Arcis IV Holdings, LLC, Arcis Equity Partners, LLC, and Blake Walker (the "Arcis Defendants"), by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On January 19, 2018, the Arcis Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Dkt. 10. The Arcis Defendants noted the motion for consideration on Friday, February 16, 2018. Dkt. 10; LCR 7(d)(3).
2. Under LCR 7(d)(3), Plaintiffs' response is due Monday, February 12, 2018, and the Arcis Defendants' reply is due Friday, February 16, 2018. LCR 7(d)(3).
3. Subject to the Court's approval, the parties have agreed to adjust the briefing schedule and noting date to allow additional time to respond to the pending motion and to accommodate previously committed travel schedules of counsel for all parties. For the same reasons, the parties have also agreed to ask the Court to defer initial case deadlines by 45 days. In agreeing to extend these deadlines, the parties do not intend to limit Plaintiffs' right to amend pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B).
4. The parties therefore ask that the Court adjust the case schedule and briefing deadlines and noting date as follows:
Event Existing Deadline New Deadline
Noting date for Motion to
Dismiss Friday, February 16, 2018 Friday, April 13, 2018
Plaintiffs' Response to the
Motion to Dismiss or Monday, February 12, 2018 Monday, March 26, 2018
Plaintiffs' Second Amended
Complaint
Arcis Defendants' Reply in
Support of the Motion to Friday, February 16, 2018 Friday, April 13, 2018
Dismiss (if no amendment)
Rule 26(f) Conference Thursday, February 1, 2018 Monday, March 19, 2018
Initial Disclosures under
Rule 26(a)(1), Thursday, February 8, 2018 Monday, March 26, 2018
Combined Joint Status
Report and Discovery Plan Thursday, February 15, 2018 Monday, April 5, 2018
under Rule 26(f) and LCR
26(f)
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing Stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the noting date on the Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), the briefing schedule on the Motion and/or the deadline for filing a Second Amended Complaint, and the case deadlines shall be adjusted as stated above.
