Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lemay v. Berryhill, C17-733-JPD. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180207e48 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES JAMES P. DONOHUE , Chief Magistrate Judge . Based upon plaintiff's amended unopposed motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412, Dkt. 23, the declaration of Lisa R.J. Porter, Dkt. 24, the assignment of EAJA fees to plaintiff's attorney by plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff , 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $ 5,662.95 , expenses of $ 6.
More

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

Based upon plaintiff's amended unopposed motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, Dkt. 23, the declaration of Lisa R.J. Porter, Dkt. 24, the assignment of EAJA fees to plaintiff's attorney by plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 U.S. (2010), it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $5,662.95, expenses of $6.43 and costs of $6.60, if not subject to any offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program as discussed in Ratliff, shall be paid to the plaintiff, and mailed to the attorney's office.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer