Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Keck v. LITB, Inc., 2:17-cv-01671-JLR. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180220b54 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2018
Summary: MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSIVE MOTION JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Michel Keck ("Plaintiff") filed her complaint on November 7, 2017 naming as defendants LITB INC. d/b/a www.lightinthebox.com and DOES 1 through 50 (collectively "Defendants") (Dkt. #1); WHEREAS, pursuant to Defendants' timely waiver of service, the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint is January 26, 2018; WHEREAS, counsel f
More

MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSIVE MOTION

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Michel Keck ("Plaintiff") filed her complaint on November 7, 2017 naming as defendants LITB INC. d/b/a www.lightinthebox.com and DOES 1 through 50 (collectively "Defendants") (Dkt. #1);

WHEREAS, pursuant to Defendants' timely waiver of service, the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint is January 26, 2018;

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff has been in communication with counsel for Defendants to discuss settlement and the parties have agreed to extend the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint for two additional weeks in light of these discussions;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the parties' agreement, Plaintiff respectfully moves the Court to extend the time for the Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint to February 9, 2018.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline for the Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to Plaintiff's complaint shall be February 9, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer