Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Struiksma v. Zones, Inc., 2:18-cv-00188-RSM. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180305570 Visitors: 1
Filed: Mar. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . STIPULATION The parties hereby file this stipulated motion pursuant to LCR 7(d)(1) and LCR 10(g) to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, which was filed in this Court on February 6, 2018 (Dkt. #1). Absent an Order extending the deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendants' responses would be due on March 1, 2018. The parties are
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

The parties hereby file this stipulated motion pursuant to LCR 7(d)(1) and LCR 10(g) to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, which was filed in this Court on February 6, 2018 (Dkt. #1). Absent an Order extending the deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendants' responses would be due on March 1, 2018.

The parties are in the process of discussing the possibility of an early negotiated settlement of this dispute, and would prefer to focus their time and resources to such discussions with the hope that a resolution of this matter might be possible without turning to the Court for assistance.

The parties, therefore, join in respectfully asking the Court to extend the deadline for Defendants to file and serve their respective Answers to Plaintiff's Complaint from the current deadline of March 1, 2018 to a new deadline of March 30, 2018.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties stipulated request for such relief, the due date for Defendants to file their respective Answers to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to March 30, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer