Jack v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., 2:17-cv-00537-JLR. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180307876
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that Plaintiffs Leslie Jack and David Jack may file without leave of court a Second Amended Complaint, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the defendants waive notice and service of the Second Amended Compl
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that Plaintiffs Leslie Jack and David Jack may file without leave of court a Second Amended Complaint, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the defendants waive notice and service of the Second Amended Compla..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that Plaintiffs Leslie Jack and David Jack may file without leave of court a Second Amended Complaint, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the defendants waive notice and service of the Second Amended Complaint and shall not be required to answer the amendment, and that all denials, responses and affirmative defenses contained in the answer filed by defendant to the original complaint shall be responsive to the amended complaint.
ORDER
The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties and finding good cause, hereby issues an Order that:
1. Plaintiffs may file without leave of court a Second Amended Complaint; and
2. Defendants waive notice and service of the Second Amended Complaint and shall not be required to answer the amendment, and that all denials, responses and affirmative defenses contained in the answers filed by defendants to the original complaint shall be responsive to the Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
