Johnson v. The Boeing Company, C17-706RSL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180326d19
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff counsel's motion for leave to withdraw. Dkt. # 47. LCR 83.2 states that a motion to withdraw "shall include a certification that the motion was served on the client and opposing counsel." LCR 83.2(b). In addition, "[i]f a withdrawal will leave a party unrepresented, the motion to withdraw must include the party's address and telephone number." Id. The motion does
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff counsel's motion for leave to withdraw. Dkt. # 47. LCR 83.2 states that a motion to withdraw "shall include a certification that the motion was served on the client and opposing counsel." LCR 83.2(b). In addition, "[i]f a withdrawal will leave a party unrepresented, the motion to withdraw must include the party's address and telephone number." Id. The motion does ..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff counsel's motion for leave to withdraw. Dkt. # 47. LCR 83.2 states that a motion to withdraw "shall include a certification that the motion was served on the client and opposing counsel." LCR 83.2(b). In addition, "[i]f a withdrawal will leave a party unrepresented, the motion to withdraw must include the party's address and telephone number." Id.
The motion does not include a certification that it was served on plaintiff. It also appears plaintiff will be unrepresented following counsel's withdrawal, and the motion does not include plaintiff's contact information. For those reasons, the motion, Dkt. # 47, is DENIED without prejudice to counsel refiling the motion in accordance with LCR 83.2.
Source: Leagle
