Owa v. Fred Meyer Stores, C16-1236 RAJ. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180328h72
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for relief from the discovery deadline. Dkt. # 153. Plaintiff files this motion nearly four months after the close of discovery, citing a host of events that predate the instant motion by weeks if not months. Moreover, the Court was clear in its prior order that it would not extend alreadypassed deadlines, and it would not entertain a motion seeking to reopen discovery. Nonetheless, Plaintiff
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for relief from the discovery deadline. Dkt. # 153. Plaintiff files this motion nearly four months after the close of discovery, citing a host of events that predate the instant motion by weeks if not months. Moreover, the Court was clear in its prior order that it would not extend alreadypassed deadlines, and it would not entertain a motion seeking to reopen discovery. Nonetheless, Plaintiff f..
More
ORDER
RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for relief from the discovery deadline. Dkt. # 153. Plaintiff files this motion nearly four months after the close of discovery, citing a host of events that predate the instant motion by weeks if not months. Moreover, the Court was clear in its prior order that it would not extend alreadypassed deadlines, and it would not entertain a motion seeking to reopen discovery. Nonetheless, Plaintiff filed the instant motion, which essentially asks this Court to reopen discovery. The Court finds no good cause or compelling reason to do so and therefore DENIES the motion.
Source: Leagle
